United States v. Ricardo Moreno, United States of America v. Rene Enrique Tineo

47 F.3d 1177 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo MORENO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rene Enrique TINEO, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-10127, 94-10278. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 17, 1995. * Decided Feb. 24, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ricardo Moreno and Rene Tineo appeal their jury convictions and sentences under the Sentencing Guidelines for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 , 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A), and unlawful use and carrying of a firearm during a federal offense, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c). Tineo's counsel has moved to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We have jurisdiction over these appeals under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm Moreno's conviction and his sentence. We grant the…