Woodbridge v. United States

Good Law
47 F.3d 1177·1995 WL 62746·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19400
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 199593-35821California133 words

Opinion

47 F.3d 1177 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Allen WOODBRIDGE; Lori Tezak, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; Benjamin Wai Silva; "Jane Doe" Silva, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof; Larry Craig; Pierce County, a political subdivision Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35821. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 6, 1995. * Decided Feb. 14, 1995. Before: SKOPIL, HALL, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 For the reasons stated by the district court we AFFIRM. * This panel unanimously agrees that this case is appropriate for submission without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4