United States v. Norman W. Olsen

47 F.3d 1177 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman W. OLSEN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30186, 93-30353. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 13, 1995. * Decided Feb. 6, 1995. 1 Before: WRIGHT and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and GONZALEZ, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Alex Busch cooperated with government agents and provided a statement regarding a drug conspiracy. The government presented the facts revealed by this statement to the grand jury, and the grand jury indicted Appellant Norman William Olsen for various drug-related offenses. After Olsen pled guilty and was sentenced, the government provided Busch's statement to the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") for its use in an administrative hearing to revoke Olsen's certificate. Olsen appeals the district court's finding that Busch's statement was not grand jury matter and not protected by Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e). He also…