United States v. Timothy W. Murphy

Good Law
47 F.3d 1177·1995 WL 62748·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19389
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 199594-50205California397 words

Opinion

Opinion

47 F.3d 1177 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy W. MURPHY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50205. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1995. Decided Feb. 13, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Southern District of California, D.C. No. CR-93-1006-MLR; Manuel L. Real, Chief District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. VACATED. 1 Before: BRUNETTI and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and SHADUR, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, we conclude that no rational trier of fact could have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, the essential elements of the crimes with which Murphy was charged. As a result, Murphy's convictions for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition under 18 U.S.C. Secs. 922 (g)(1) and 924(e) must be reversed. 4 To prove the element of possession, the government had to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.