United States v. Joseph Meling

Good Law
47 F.3d 1546·95 Daily Journal DAR 2333·1995 WL 69258·41 Fed. R. Serv. 593·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 3315
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 199593-30238California5,474 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kozinski, J.

In 1990, Joseph Meling took out several hundred thousand dollars in life insurance on his wife; in early 1991, he added accidental death benefits. All told, Meling stood to collect $700,000 if his wife happened to die in an accident. Meling was not just being prudent; he was planning for the future.

Meling, however, wasn’t satisfied to leave such important matters to chance: The day after the coverage became effective, he fed his wife a capsule of cyanide-laced Sudafed. Miraculously, she survived, but Meling’s amateur pharmacology continued. Worried he might be suspected in the poisoning, Meling concocted a scheme to divert official attention elsewhere. What better place to hide a tree than in the forest? So Meling laced five packages of Sudafed with lethal amounts of cyanide and planted them on drug store shelves, killing two people before Burroughs-Wellcome could institute a national recall of its product.

This macabre scheme wasn’t Meling’s only attempt to divert suspicion. First, he played the dutifully distraught husband: When his wife collapsed from the poison, Meling phoned 911 and feigned hysteria, then melodramatically vowed to the paramedic who arrived on the scene…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.