Jan Johnson v. Multnomah County, Oregon, a Political Subdivision of State of Oregon William McKinley Paul Yarborough

Good Law
48 F.3d 420·95 Daily Journal DAR 2097·1995 WL 61328·10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 481·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2894
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 199593-35353California4,070 words

Opinion

Opinion

Norris, J.

Jan Johnson appeals an adverse summary judgment on her claim for violation of her First Amendment right to free speech. Johnson claims that she was fired from her county job because of statements she made about her supervisor, statements she claims were protected by the First Amendment. The district court ruled that her speech was not protected, entered summary judgment against her § 1983 claim and dismissed her pendent state law claims without prejudice. We review the summary judgement de novo. Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994).

I

Johnson was employed by Multnomah County as an administrative assistant in the Department of Environmental Services. Her job was to assist the manager of the county Expo Center and assist in the planning and supervision of the annual county fair. When her immediate supervisor left his position, Johnson applied for his job, but was not chosen to succeed him. Johnson believed herself to be better qualified than William McKinley, the man the County hired. Soon after McKinley was hired, Johnson began making statements to coworkers and others accusing McKinley of mismanagement and possible criminal conduct.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.