Williams v. Vucetin CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 21, 2022B314758California5,982 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 7/21/22 Williams v. Vucetin CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

STACIE WILLIAMS, B314758

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and (Los Angeles County Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 20STCV30308)

v.

PETAR VUCETIN and HEATHER VUCETIN, as Trustees, etc., et al.,

Defendants, Cross- complainants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Steven J. Kleifield, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of David L. Amkraut, David L. Amkraut; Law Offices of Harold C. Klaskin and Harold C. Klaskin for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant. Meylan Davitt Jain Arevian & Kim, Vincent J. Davitt and Anita Jain for Defendants,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.