Yvonne Quintero v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 202220-55883California979 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YVONNE QUINTERO; SALVADOR No. 20-55883

QUINTERO,

D.C. Nos. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:18-cv-01912-AB-FFM 2:18-ml-02814-AB-FFM v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 17, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: BRESS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,** District Judge.

Yvonne and Salvador Quintero sued Ford Motor Company for breach of

express warranty and breach of implied warranty in relation to their leased Ford

Focus under California’s “lemon law,” the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. Cal. Civ. Code §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.