United States v. Luke Warner

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 202222-10004California443 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10004

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:14-cr-00688-HG-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LUKE WARNER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Helen W. Gillmor, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Luke Warner appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying his

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) and various

supplemental motions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Warner first contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for

compassionate release. Warner has not shown, however, that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.