United States v. Kaleb Basey
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 202221-30196California445 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 21 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30196
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00028-RRB-
v.
KALEB L. BASEY, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2022**
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Kaleb L. Basey appeals pro se from the district court’s orders granting his
motion for return of property under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g) and
denying reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we
affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Basey’s request for oral argument is denied. As an initial matter, we reject Basey’s…