United States v. Kaleb Basey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 202221-30196California445 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30196

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00028-RRB-

v.

KALEB L. BASEY, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Kaleb L. Basey appeals pro se from the district court’s orders granting his

motion for return of property under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g) and

denying reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Basey’s request for oral argument is denied. As an initial matter, we reject Basey’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.