Dyke
Tyrone Lee v. Dyke
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 202221-35850California268 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 21 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TYRONE JERALD LEE, No. 21-35850
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01245-MO
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DYKE,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2022**
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Docket Entry No. 6) is
granted.
Tyrone Jerald Lee appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying
Lee’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). alleging claims arising from his pre-trial detention. We have jurisdiction under