Peter Garcia v. Waterfall Community Health

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 202221-35418California422 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PETER GARCIA, No. 21-35418

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:20-cv-01800-MC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

WATERFALL COMMUNITY HEALTH

CENTER,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Peter Garcia appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

action alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

(“ADEA”), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and state law. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.