Peter Garcia v. Waterfall Community Health
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 202221-35418California422 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 21 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PETER GARCIA, No. 21-35418
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:20-cv-01800-MC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
WATERFALL COMMUNITY HEALTH
CENTER,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2022**
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Peter Garcia appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
action alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
(“ADEA”), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and state law. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…