Hamid Hejazi v. Mark Esper
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 202221-35711California296 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 21 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, No. 21-35711
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:19-cv-00149-MK
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MARK T. ESPER, Secretary, Department of the Army; UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY; U.S.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2022**
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Hamid Michael Hejazi appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his employment action alleging discrimination. We have jurisdiction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for
failure to serve the…