Hamid Hejazi v. Mark Esper

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 202221-35711California296 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, No. 21-35711

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:19-cv-00149-MK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARK T. ESPER, Secretary, Department of the Army; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY; U.S.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Hamid Michael Hejazi appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his employment action alleging discrimination. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for

failure to serve the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.