People v. Remy CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 21, 2022E071805California4,254 words

Opinion

Opinion

I.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant Willie James Remy, Jr., was convicted of unlawful

possession of weapons, ammunition, and drug paraphernalia. In a separate proceeding,

he was convicted of domestic violence and assault with a deadly weapon. The trial court

sentenced him to 18 years, eight months.

Defendant argues the trial court erroneously admitted expert testimony from a

police detective about domestic violence. We disagree. Defendant also argues, and the

People agree, that the matter should be remanded for resentencing and for a hearing on

his ability to pay the fines and fees that the trial court imposed. We agree with the parties

that remand for resentencing and an ability-to-pay hearing is appropriate. We therefore

affirm defendant’s convictions and remand for resentencing.

II.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In September 2015, a neighbor saw a gun in defendant’s waistband and called 911.

Defendant put the gun in the trunk of his car. The responding officers searched defendant

and his car. The officers found a revolver and a box of 46 rounds in the car and a

methamphetamine pipe in his pocket.

About a year later, police were dispatched to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.