In re Daniel Q.M. CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2022B314090California3,389 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

Filed 7/22/22 In re Daniel Q.M. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

In re Daniel Q.M., et al., Persons B314090 Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. 18CCJP06061, 18CCJP06061A-C)

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN

AND FAMILY SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

S.G.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stephen Marpet, Judge Pro Tempore. Affirmed in part, denied in part. Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis and Vincent W. Davis, for Defendant and Appellant. Rodrigo A. Castro-Silva, County Counsel, Kim Nemoy, Assistant County Counsel, William D. Thetford, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Appellant S.G. is maternal aunt to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.