People v. Barkacs CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified an issue that was considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: Whether the trial court erred in concluding Barkacs was ineligible for resentencing under section 1172.6. We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Barkacs on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order denying Barkacs’s second petition for resentencing under section 1172.6 is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

IRION, J.

BUCHANAN, J.

3