Mirna Selene Gil-Dominguez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 202221-74California302 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIRNA SELENE GIL-DOMINGUEZ, No. 21-

Petitioner, Agency No. A202-014-732

v.

MEMORANDUM

MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Mirna Selene Gil-Dominguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying her appeal from

an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for withholding of

removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Conde Quevedo v. Barr, 947

F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th Cir. 2020). We deny the petition for review.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.