Florencio Zatarain Osuna v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 202221-2California333 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FLORENCIO ZATARAIN OSUNA, No. 21-

Petitioner, Agency No. A095-726-659

v.

MEMORANDUM

MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Florencio Zatarain Osuna, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his

motion to reopen and terminate removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a

motion to reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and

the denial of a motion to terminate, Dominguez v. Barr, 975 F.3d 725, 734 (9th

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.