People v. Zhuk CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2022C093995California3,482 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Factual and Procedural Background The facts underlying defendant’s crimes as relevant here, set forth in our unpublished opinion People v. Zhuk (July 18, 2008, No. C047365) (nonpub. opn.), as modified on denial of rehearing (Aug. 15, 2008) (Zhuk I) affirming defendant’s convictions, were as follows: In 2000, Cindy Chung drove her BMW to an autobody shop owned by her father. Defendant, then 17 years old, codefendant Mikhael Vlasov, and 14-year-old Peter P. began following Chung; defendant carried a loaded handgun and said he knew people who would pay money for a BMW or Mercedes. Defendant d iscussed ordering drivers out of the desired cars at gunpoint. Defendant followed Chung to the autobody shop, parked nearby, and gave the gun to Vlasov. He instructed Vlasov to run up to the driver of the car, stick the gun in her face, and take away the car. Peter P. heard Vlasov check the gun’s magazine and watched him leave the car. (Zhuk I, supra, C047365.)

Further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. 2 Defendant filed the petition in 2020. Effective June 30, 2022, the Legislature renumbered section 1170.95 to section 1172.6. (Stats. 2022, ch.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.