People v. Broussard CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2022A161139California6,739 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 7/22/22 P. v. Broussard CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A161139

v. CARLTON BROUSSARD, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 177907A) Defendant and Appellant.

A jury convicted defendant Carlton Broussard of two counts of first degree murder and other offenses. On appeal, defendant contends the jury was incorrectly instructed on self-defense because the instruction stated that defendant “must have acted only because of” his belief that he was in imminent danger of death or great bodily injury. (Italics added.) We reject this contention and find no prejudice in any event. Defendant also raises claims of sentencing error. As to his challenge to the imposition of fines and fees based on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.