Foti v. Graham

48 F.3d 1227 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert J. FOTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John GRAHAM; William Lamb, Judge; Galen Hathaway, Judge; Randolph E. Heubach; Jerry Herman; James Conway, Deputy District Atty.; Pamela Bousquet, Deputy District Atty.; Laurie J. Mintz, Deputy District Atty.; John Posey, Deputy District Atty.; Rosemary Slote, Deputy District Atty.; John P. Montgomery, Clerk of Court; A.A. Pierce; Richard Pisciotta; Stuart Cowan; Christopher Kauper; Eric Huot, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15923. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 15, 1995. * Decided Feb. 22, 1995. IN PART VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Robert J. Foti appeals pro se the district court's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action challenging his arrest and conviction for driving with a suspended license and resisting arrest. We review for abuse of discretion…