Angelica Alfaro v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

48 F.3d 1227 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Angelica ALFARO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70525. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 10, 1995. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, INS No. Aor-gti-arp. BIA PETITION DENIED. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Angelica Alfaro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of her appeal as untimely from an immigration judge's ("IJ") order of deportation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review. 3 We review de novo the BIA's determination that an appeal is untimely. Da Cruz v. INS, 4 F.3d 721, 722 (9th Cir.1993) (citing Montes v. Thornburgh, 919 F.2d 531, 534 (9th Cir.1990)). 4 Absent unique circumstances, the time limit for filing a notice…