Branson v. Fletcher

48 F.3d 1227 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald L. BRANSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Betty B. FLETCHER, personal capacity; Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, personal capacity; Andrew J. Kleinfeld, personal capacity; William D. Keller, personal capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55951. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 21, 1995. * Decided Feb. 27, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald Branson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his Bivens action against a district judge and three judges of this court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 1 3 We agree with the district court that Branson's claims are barred by the doctrine of judicial immunity. See Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada, 828 F.2d 1385, 1394 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1040 (1988). The district court properly denied Branson's motion for recusal…