Daniel Denardo v. Richard E. Collum

48 F.3d 1227 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel DENARDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard E. COLLUM, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35035. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 21, 1995. * Decided Feb. 27, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel Denardo appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that Richard E. Collum and the State of Alaska Executive Clemency Advisory Committee violated his constitutional rights by denying him access to records pertaining to his petition for executive clemency. 3 The denial of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is immediately appealable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . Tripati v. Rison, 847 F.2d 548 (9th Cir.1988). We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, O'Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1990), and we…