Kristina Salka Ludovit Salka v. City of Los Angeles Arthur Azdair Harold Vites, and Daniel Drake Linda Paugh

48 F.3d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kristina SALKA; Ludovit Salka, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Arthur Azdair; Harold Vites, Defendants, and Daniel Drake; Linda Paugh, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55264. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 15, 1995. * Decided Feb. 22, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Kristina and Ludovit Salka ("the Salkas") appeal pro se the district court's summary judgment for Daniel Drake and Linda Paugh in the Salkas's action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 , 1985(3) and 1986. 1 The Salkas alleged that their neighbors, Drake and Paugh, conspired with members of the Los Angeles Police Department and the City Attorney's Office to conceal a drug manufacturing operation which causes toxic fumes to be released toward the Salkas's house. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, United Steel Workers v.…