Jose Gelito Rodriguez v. A.L. Bell, Lieutenant and Alan B. Adison

Good Law
48 F.3d 1228·1995 WL 81944·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21829
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 199594-15440California403 words

Opinion

Opinion

48 F.3d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose Gelito RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.L. BELL, Lieutenant and Alan B. Adison, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15440. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 21, 1995. * Decided Feb. 28, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Gelito Rodriguez, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint alleging that his rights to freedom of association and to due process were violated. The district court dismissed Rodriguez's action for failing to submit an amended complaint in a timely manner. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and vacate and remand. 3 We review for abuse of discretion a district court's dismissal on grounds that a party failed to comply with a district court order requiring submission of an amended complaint in a timely manner. See Ferdik…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.