Madabhushi v. Pliney

48 F.3d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Govindachari V. MADABHUSHI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Young A. PLINEY, Chief, Office of Civil Rights, Department of Health Services; Kenneth Kizer, Md., Director, CA Dept. of Health Services; Jan Radimsky, Chief, Siting Std Alternative Technology; John J. Kearns, Deputy dir. Toxic Substance Control Program; Ted Rans, Chief, Program Adm & Support Div. TSCP; Carol Kavooras; Mike James; Howard Hatayama; Tony Landis, Chief, Site Mitigation, Region-1 TSCP; Caroline Cabias, Chief, Adm Services & adm Support Div. TSCP and Stan Phillipe, Chief, Site Mitigation Program & adm Support Div., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16086. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1994. * Decided Feb. 23, 1995. 1 Before: ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges, and KING, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Govindachari Madabhushi, an engineer employed by the State of California, challenges on appeal various…