United States v. Howard Moseley, Jr.

48 F.3d 1229 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Howard MOSELEY, JR., Defendant-Appellant, No. 94-50098. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 7, 1995. Decided Feb. 27, 1995. Before: TROTT, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The parties are familiar with the facts, so we need not recite them here. We affirm the district court's evidentiary ruling excluding the testimony of Special Agent Schroeder. The district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the proposed testimony on the ground that it was inadmissible hearsay. Agent Schroeder testified he had no personal knowledge that Roberto Sheldon Brown (aka "Casper") personally coerced people into committing robberies. The defense's proffer did not demonstrate that Schroeder had any familiarity with the defendant. Even assuming Schroeder's testimony was not inadmissible hearsay, it was not…