United States v. Huwell Craig, AKA Taylor Vanderpool, Vanderpool, United States of America v. Huwell Lyonell Craig, AKA R.A. Brent, United States of America v. Huwell Lyonell Craig, AKA Ryan Anthony Brent AKA Brent Cartwright AKA Damien Lyonell Craig

Good Law
48 F.3d 1229·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21882
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 199594-50266California794 words

Opinion

Opinion

48 F.3d 1229 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Huwell CRAIG, aka Taylor Vanderpool, Vanderpool, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Huwell Lyonell CRAIG, aka R.A. Brent, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Huwell Lyonell CRAIG, aka Ryan Anthony Brent; aka Brent Cartwright; aka Damien Lyonell Craig, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-50266, 94-50277, 94-50278. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 15, 1995. * Decided Feb. 23, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Huwell Craig appeals his sentence imposed after we remanded his case for resentencing. 1 Craig pled guilty to criminal charges related to bank fraud. Craig contends that the district court erred in conducting only a limited review of his sentence on remand. In particular, Craig argues that the district court was not barred from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.