United States v. Nina Kay Jordan, AKA Nina Kay Gilcrist

Good Law
48 F.3d 1229·1995 WL 74702·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21894
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 199594-30246California1,097 words

Opinion

Opinion

48 F.3d 1229 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nina Kay JORDAN, aka Nina Kay Gilcrist, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30246. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 15, 1995. * Decided Feb. 23, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nina Kay Jordan appeals her forty-six month sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to two counts of possession of stolen mail in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1708 , and one count of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1344 . Jordan contends the district court erred by: (1) denying a reduction in her offense level for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3E1.1; and (2) failing to resolve disputed factual matters in the presentence report ("PSR") in violation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 * Acceptance of Responsibility 4 Whether a defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.