United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong, Aka: Chris Armstrong, and Robert Rozelle Aaron Hampton Freddie Mack Shelton Auntwan Martin, United States of America v. Christopher Lee Armstrong, Aka: Chris Armstrong

Good Law
48 F.3d 1508·95 Daily Journal DAR 2777·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4040·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1585
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 199593-50031California18,983 words

Opinion

Opinion

48 F.3d 1508 63 USLW 2581 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher Lee ARMSTRONG, aka: Chris Armstrong, Defendant, and Robert Rozelle; Aaron Hampton; Freddie Mack; Shelton Auntwan Martin, Defendants-Appellees. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher Lee ARMSTRONG, aka: Chris Armstrong, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 93-50031, 93-50057. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1993. Filed Jan. 21, 1994. Opinion Withdrawn April 20, 1994. Filed April 20, 1994. Argued and Submitted (en banc) Sept. 22, 1994. Decided March 2, 1995. Richard E. Drooyan, Miriam A. Krinsky, Daniel P. Collins, George S. Cardona, Lawrence H. Cho, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. Timothy C. Lannen, Barbara E. O'Connor, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Joseph F. Walsh, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, REINHARDT, LEAVY, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Concurrence by Judge WALLACE; Dissent by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.