Mohammed Baher Elramly v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
49 F.3d 535·95 Daily Journal DAR 2745·1995 WL 82905·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4005·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1576
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 199593-70369California1,579 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

The Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) is seeking to deport Mohammed Baher Elramly because in 1982 he was convicted of selling $100.00 worth of hashish. Elramly sought discretionary relief based on section 212(c) of the Immigration Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (e). Because the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) failed to examine the particular nature of Elramly’s drug offense and categorically concluded that it was a “serious drug offense,” we grant the petition for review, vacate the BIA’s decision, and remand.

I

Elramly lawfully entered the United States on a nonimmigrant student visa in 1976. In 1979, he married a United States citizen and became a lawful permanent resident. During his marriage he had three children. In 1982, Elramly pleaded guilty to two counts of “unlawfully and knowingly selling] resin extract of Cannabis, commonly known as Hashish,” in violation of Florida Statute 893.13(l)(a)(2). For this offense, El-ramly received a 90 day sentence, three years probation, and a fíne.

After Elramly divorced in 1990, the INS ordered Elramly to show cause for why he should not be deported because of his 1982 drug offense, pursuant to the Immigration Act § 241. 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.