Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,422 William Kaplan, Administrator of the Estate of Lois Kaplan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated Thomas Devere v. Freeman Rose Errol Payne Richard Penfil David Radlinski Weeden & Co., L.P. Medstone International, Inc., Georgiane Kramer, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Freeman Rose Medstone International, Inc. Errol Payne Richard Penfil David Radlinski Weeden & Co., L.P.

Good Law
49 F.3d 1363
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 199592-55879California11,404 words

Opinion

Opinion

49 F.3d 1363 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,422 William KAPLAN, Administrator of the Estate of Lois Kaplan, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Thomas Devere, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Freeman ROSE; Errol Payne; Richard Penfil; David Radlinski; Weeden & Co., L.P.; Medstone International, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Georgiane KRAMER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Freeman ROSE; Medstone International, Inc.; Errol Payne; Richard Penfil; David Radlinski; Weeden & Co., L.P., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-55879, 92-56055. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 1, 1994. Decided Oct. 11, 1994. Rehearing Denied Feb. 9, 1995. Leonard B. Simon, Milberg Weiss Bershad Specthrie & Lerach, Edward M. Gergosian, Barrack, Rudos & Racine, San Diego, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Paul L. Gale and Darryl S. Gibson, Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth, Newport Beach, CA, for defendant-appellee Freeman Rose. Robert E. Currie, Latham & Watkins, Costa Mesa, CA, for other defendants-appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.