Reebok International Limited v. Byron Mclaughlin

Good Law
49 F.3d 1387·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4239·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1672
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 199593-55961California4,758 words

Opinion

Opinion

49 F.3d 1387 63 USLW 2565 REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (a Massachusetts corporation) and Reebok International Limited (a limited company of the United Kingdom), Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Byron McLAUGHLIN a/k/a Beck Marketing Agency a/k/a Beck Buying Group, et al., Defendants, and Banque Internationale A Luxembourg S.A., Appellant. No. 93-55961. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1995. Decided March 6, 1995. Lawrence M. Harnett, Marks & Murase, New York City, and Matthew E. Digby, Marks, Murase & White, Los Angeles, CA, for appellant. Harley I. Lewin, Lewin & Laytin, New York City, and Bennett A. Bigman, Stein & Kahan, Santa Monica, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Before: TROTT, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: 1 Banque Internationale a Luxembourg S.A. ("BIL") appeals the district court's orders summarily holding it in contempt 1 and assessing sanctions against it in the amount of $2,680,417.30. BIL argues that the district court had neither subject matter nor personal jurisdiction over it. Because we agree…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.