Angela K. Hagestad v. Roger C. Tragesser v. Oregon State Bar, Intervenor-Appellant

Bad Law
49 F.3d 1430·95 Daily Journal DAR 3230·1995 WL 101836·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4794·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1880
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 199593-35185California1,949 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tashima, J.

The Oregon State. Bar (the “State Bar”), as intervenor, appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to compel production of documents and a deposition, and the district court’s grant of defendant-appellee Roger Tragesser’s (“Tragesser”) motions to enforce a settlement agreement and quash service of subpoena, and to seal the court’s file.

BACKGROUND

Angela Hagestad (“Hagestad”) commenced an action in the District of Oregon alleging that Tragesser, a member of the State Bar, had sexual relations with her over a period of seven years when she was a minor. Jurisdiction was predicated on diversity of citizenship. Approximately two years later, Hages-tad filed a complaint against Tragesser with the State Bar, repeating her .allegations of sexual abuse. Some months later Hagestad and Tragesser settled the civil action. Pursuant to the settlement, an order of dismissal was filed on July 14, 1992 (the “Dismissal”). The Dismissal stated in its entirety:

The court did not seal the court records at the time of the settlement or dismissal.

The State Bar subsequently issued a subpoena in its disciplinary investigation of Tra-gesser to Hagestad, requiring her to produce copies of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.