Carlos Barela Chavaris v. Bud Prunty Bryan S. Gunn

50 F.3d 13 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carlos Barela CHAVARIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bud PRUNTY; Bryan S. Gunn, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55283. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 9, 1995. * Decided March 20, 1995. 1 Before: BRUNETTI and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and SHADUR, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 The district court dismissed Chavaris' complaint pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c), because Chavaris did not file an opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss. We may affirm on any basis presented by the record, Compton v. Ide, 732 F.2d 1429, 1433 (9th Cir.1984), and affirm on the ground that Chavaris did not allege facts that, if proven, would entitle him to relief. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). 4 The Civil Rights Act provides relief only against those who, through their personal involvement, cause the deprivation of another's constitutionally protected rights. Leer v. Murphy, 844 F.2d 628, 633 (9th…