Clapp v. County of Mono

50 F.3d 13 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard L. CLAPP, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF MONO, James S. Reed, Counsel for Mono County, et al.; State of California, on relation of its Public employees' Retirement System, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16617. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 13, 1995. Decided March 2, 1995. Before: REINHARDT, THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Richard L. Clapp, M.D., appeals the dismissal of his lawsuit against Mono County, its board of supervisors and its county counsel, and against California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS). Clapp's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 claim against the County, the board of supervisors and the county counsel was dismissed as time-barred. His claims for declaratory and injunctive relief against PERS were dismissed as unripe. Finally, the court declined to exercise jurisdiction over Clapp's state law claims for breach…