Jose Castillo, Jr. v. California Department of Parks and Recreation California State Personnel Board

50 F.3d 13 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose CASTILLO, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION; California State Personnel Board, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15278. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided March 21, 1995. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Castillo ("Castillo") appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants California Department of Parks and Recreation and California State Personnel Board (collectively "the Department"), in Castillo's action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e et seq. ("Title VII"). 3 * On June 14, 1989, the Department notified Castillo that he was disqualified from consideration for the peace officer position of State Park Ranger ("Ranger") because he was not mentally fit for the position. After losing his administrative appeals…