Alana Cash v. Los Angeles County District Attorney

50 F.3d 13 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alana CASH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56140. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 9, 1995. * Decided March 16, 1995. Before: BROWNING, D.W. NELSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Alana Cash brought suit against appellee, the Los Angeles County District Attorney ("the D.A."), for alleged constitutional violations arising from the D.A.'s mishandling of the effort to secure child support payments from Tom Stern, the father of her child. The district court dismissed the claim with prejudice on the ground that the D.A. was immune from suit. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm the dismissal of the damages claims on immunity grounds, and we affirm the dismissal of the remaining claims as moot. STANDARD OF REVIEW 3 This court reviews dismissal of a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) de novo.…