Angela Cofield v. Banc One Corporation/bank One of Arizona

50 F.3d 13 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Angela COFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANC ONE CORPORATION/BANK ONE OF ARIZONA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-16577. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 9, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Angela Cofield appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her complaint brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et. seq. The district court dismissed Cofield's complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo, Kruso v. Int'l Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 Cofield filed an employment discrimination claim against Valley National Bank on August 2,…