Denise Blossom-Fossett v. Golden Age Fisheries, a Washington Corporation, Pacific Orion Seafoods, Inc., a Washington Corporation

50 F.3d 13 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Denise BLOSSOM-FOSSETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOLDEN AGE FISHERIES, a Washington corporation, Pacific Orion Seafoods, Inc., a Washington corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-36127. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 10, 1995. Decided March 7, 1995. 1 Before: ALARCON and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Denise Blossom-Fossett filed a claim under general admiralty law for maintenance and cure from her former employer, Golden Age Fisheries. The district court concluded that her claim was time barred, granted Golden Age's motion for summary judgment, and denied Blossom-Fossett's motion to reconsider. We affirm. 4 Both parties argue that Blossom-Fossett's cause of action accrued on the date when payment of maintenance and cure ceased. 1 On the basis of the affidavit of Golden Age's claims adjuster, which states such payments were…