Werner William Janer v. United States

50 F.3d 14 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Werner William JANER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-55810. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 13, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Werner Janer appeals pro se the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . Janer is serving a 97-month sentence following his guilty plea to mail and bank fraud, money laundering, and currency structuring. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 and affirm. Janer argues first that the district court erred by adjusting his offense level for obstruction of justice. We rejected this argument on the merits in Janer's direct appeal. Citing United States v. Mondello, 927 F.2d 1463, 1466-67 (9th Cir.1991), we upheld the obstruction of justice adjustment because Janer had fled from an FBI agent and then used a…