John Wallace Hooper v. Lance Anderson Anthony Wallace

Good Law
50 F.3d 14·1995 WL 11082
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 199593-35422California652 words

Opinion

Opinion

50 F.3d 14 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Wallace HOOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lance ANDERSON; Anthony Wallace, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35422. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. * Memorandum Filed Oct. 6, 1994. Memorandum Withdrawn and Decided Jan. 10, 1995. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. ORDER Appellant's petition for rehearing is granted. The panel has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35. The suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected. The unpublished memorandum disposition filed October 6, 1994 is withdrawn. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the attached memorandum disposition. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Wallace Hooper, an Idaho state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.