Peter H. Gryner v. Michael T.W. Stone, Secretary of the Army

50 F.3d 14 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Peter H. GRYNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael T.W. STONE, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15047. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 15, 1995. * Decided March 6, 1995. Before: SNEED, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Peter Gryner appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Army. Gryner's complaint alleged that the Secretary's termination of his employment as a Czech language instructor at the Army's Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California constituted disability and reprisal discrimination, as well as breach of contract and wrongful discharge. 3 Gryner has a history of problems with his superiors, marked by his inability to perform his duties adequately, his settlement of certain claims against his employer, and his failure to exhaust certain remedies. We have examined the record of this…