Douglas Edward Green v. Linda Carlsen, Librarian N.P. Butlin, Nurse Practitioner

Good Law
50 F.3d 14·1995 WL 82676·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18868
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 199594-16526California414 words

Opinion

Opinion

50 F.3d 14 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Douglas Edward GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Linda CARLSEN, Librarian; N.P. Butlin, Nurse Practitioner, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16526. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 21, 1995. * Decided March 1, 1995. Before SCHROEDER, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Douglas Edward Green, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for preliminary injunctive relief in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Green contends that prison officials ignored his serious medical needs by discontinuing his treatment with the prescription drug Dilantin for seizures. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. 3 Our discretionary review of the record indicates the district court examined Green's request for injunctive relief under the proper legal standard. See Diamontiney v. Borg, 918 F.2d 793, 795-96 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.