Abdullah Akbar Lumumba, AKA Godfrey Carroll v. Joseph Crabtree, Warden

50 F.3d 15 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Abdullah Akbar LUMUMBA, aka Godfrey Carroll, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph CRABTREE, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35539. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1995. * Decided March 14, 1995. Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** I. 2 Abdullah Akbar Lumumba, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant federal prison officials in his Bivens action. 1 Lumumba contends that the defendants discriminated against him in his prison work assignment based on his race and handicap, and seeks monetary damages and declaratory relief. The district court determined that the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity and dismissed Lumumba's claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and review de novo. Alexander v. Perrill, 916 F.2d 1392, 1395 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm. II. 3…