Glenn J. McCurdy v. Mary S. Sandoval, Al Lutzi, Francis J. Bardsley, Darrell Vandeveld, Gary L. Edwards, and Michael S. Berg

Good Law
50 F.3d 15
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 13, 199594-55820California1,533 words

Opinion

Opinion

50 F.3d 15 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Glenn J. McCURDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary S. SANDOVAL, Al Lutzi, Francis J. Bardsley, Darrell Vandeveld, Gary L. Edwards, and Michael S. Berg, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55820. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 9, 1995. As Amended April 13, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Glenn J. McCurdy, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against police officers and former defense counsel, alleging violations of his constitutional rights in connection with his October 17, 1990 conviction for residential burglary. 1 The district court ruled that McCurdy's action was barred by the statute of limitations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We reverse and remand. 3 * Statute of Limitations 4 McCurdy contends that his action was tolled by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.