Derek Leslie v. John R. Hallahan Attorney General of the State of Arizona

50 F.3d 15 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Derek LESLIE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John R. HALLAHAN; Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-15950. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided March 23, 1995. IN PART, VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Derek Leslie, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition. Leslie's habeas petition involves his 1980 conviction for robbery and his 1991 conviction for armed robbery. Leslie contends that his 1980 guilty plea was invalid due to: (1) ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) the trial court's failure to notify Leslie of his appeal rights; and (3) the trial court's denial of due process. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo, Sanders v. Ratelle, 21 F.3d 1446, 1451 (9th Cir.1994),…