Elsa Galves Pulido v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

50 F.3d 15 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elsa Galves PULIDO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70331. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 16, 1994. Decided March 6, 1995. Before: HUG, CANBY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * I. 2 Elsa Galves Pulido petitions this court for review of a final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Pulido argues that the BIA erred in relying on a facially defective marriage contract as evidence that she was married when she entered the United States as the unmarried daughter of a United States citizen. She also argues that the BIA erred in finding that she gave false testimony during her deportation hearing and therefore was statutorily ineligible for voluntary departure. We vacate the BIA's order and remand the case to the BIA to determine whether the marriage contract was valid. II. 3 The BIA affirmed…