In Re William H. Porter, Debtor. Jeffry G. Locke v. William Heyn Jean Heyn

Good Law
50 F.3d 15·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20882
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 199518-55169California271 words

Opinion

Opinion

50 F.3d 15 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re William H. PORTER, Debtor. Jeffry G. LOCKE, Appellant, v. William HEYN; Jean Heyn, Appellees. No. 93-16573. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 15, 1995. Decided March 15, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Jeffry G. Locke (Trustee) appeals the ruling of the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, which affirmed the order of the bankruptcy court judgment in favor of William and Jean Heyn. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d) and affirm. 3 We independently review the bankruptcy court's decision and do not give deference to the BAP's determinations. In re Burley, 738 F.2d 981 , 988 (9th Cir.1984). In our review, we conclude that the opinion of the BAP in this case correctly sets forth the law and the application of that law as appropriate in this case. We therefore adopt it as our own. 4 We further note that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.